Sooner — Cash Flow & Tax Architecture

Working draft — 2026-05-05. Working assumption: PM-Buyer Property Management Agreement governs Tenanted Unit residual flow (open point for Walkers/Victoria). UAE-only tax structure (no UK royalty exposure). Group effective UAE Corporate Tax: 0% in loss years; ~14–15% at Y3 run-rate (proportional to genuine group profit per the financial model).

1 — Structure summary

The deal in one paragraph.

Sooner finances closing fees (~AED 150K per AED 2M property) for end-buyers using a 5-year Murabaha facility from Amwal Capital (80% advance, 15% Murabaha profit, bullet at Y5). The buyer repays via AED 3,750/mo for 60 months (= AED 150K principal + AED 75K Murabaha profit element = AED 225K total). The structure books the Murabaha profit at Sooner PM (mainland operating entity, the legal lessor + Murabaha financier of record). PM expenses ~80% of the gross profit element (AED 1,000/mo per active loan) to Tech (DDA Free Zone, Qualifying Free Zone Person) via three priced-separately intra-group services fees. PM retains AED 250/mo per active loan as a servicing margin, calibrated quarterly to AED 375K of taxable income (the Small Business Relief threshold) via a cost-plus 5% recharge from Tech. SPV (ADGM) is structured as a pass-through that books zero — buys the receivable from PM at face value, holds it for Amwal's bankruptcy-remoteness comfort, and passes collections to Amwal. Sooner RE + Mortgages earn one-off commissions per closing; Tech absorbs a portion of their profit via cost-plus 5% recharge + a software licence fee for use of Sooner's lending platform. Residual mainland profit at SRE + Mortgages is taxed at 9% above AED 375K. UK Holding is the parent (no UK royalty exposure; brand IP sits at Holding for legal-ownership purposes only and is licensed royalty-free to mainland subs).

2 — Closing-day cash flow (per AED 2M deal)

One-time event at deal close. Shows where the AED 150K of closing fees comes from, where it goes, and what Sooner books as income. Numbers in AED, working estimates pending Gabriel confirmation.
Cash sources / external counterparties Sooner Group entities Third-party recipients
flowchart LR AMWAL["Amwal advance
~AED 83K
(80% × net cash deployed)"] TECH["Tech Qard al-Hasan
~AED 21K
(20% equity)"] BANK["Mortgage Bank
(separate from closing fees)"] SOONER(("Sooner Group
perimeter at closing")) SRE["Sooner RE
books AED 28,875 income
(1% commission AED 21K +
conveyancing AED 7,875)"] MORT["ReMatch Mortgages
books AED 16,800 income
(0.8% × AED 2M + VAT,
paid by bank)"] DLD["DLD
~AED 85K
(4% transfer fee +
trustee + admin)"] EXT_AGENT["External agent
AED 21K
(1% of property + VAT)"] BANK_FEES["Bank fees
AED 12.7K
(mortgage registration
+ processing)"] OTHER["Valuation / NOC /
insurance setup
AED 6.2K"] AMWAL -->|"funding"| SOONER TECH -->|"funding"| SOONER BANK -->|"AED 16,800 fee
(referral)"| MORT MORT -.->|"sits in group"| SOONER SOONER -->|"AED 80K + AED 5K"| DLD SOONER -->|"AED 21K"| EXT_AGENT SOONER -->|"AED 12.7K"| BANK_FEES SOONER -->|"AED 6.2K"| OTHER SOONER -.->|"internal: commission
+ conveyancing AED 28,875"| SRE classDef finance fill:#d4e4f4,stroke:#2d4a7a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a1a3a classDef ops fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef ext fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a classDef central fill:#e8e8e0,stroke:#6a6a5a,stroke-width:2px,color:#3a3a2a class AMWAL,TECH,BANK finance class SRE,MORT ops class DLD,EXT_AGENT,BANK_FEES,OTHER ext class SOONER central
Per AED 2M deal closing-day flow:
  • Sooner deploys ~AED 150K of closing fees on behalf of the buyer (financed via Amwal + Tech). Of this, ~AED 121K leaves the group (DLD, external agents, bank fees, valuation/NOC/insurance) and ~AED 28,875 stays internally as Sooner RE income (commission + conveyancing).
  • Mortgage Bank pays Sooner Mortgages ~AED 16,800 as a referral fee (0.8% of property value + VAT) — separate from the closing-fee pool, comes IN to the group.
  • Net cash deployed by Sooner per deal: ~AED 104K (AED 150K outflow − AED 28,875 internal − AED 16,800 from bank). Funded 80% Amwal / 20% Tech Qard.
  • Total Sooner internal income per deal: AED 45,675 booked across SRE (AED 28,875) and Mortgages (AED 16,800). This is recurring per origination.

3 — Cash flow & income recognition by unit type

Lifecycle view: how money moves over the 5-year loan tenor, depending on whether the buyer occupies the property themselves or rents it out.
Free Zone (0% tax) Finance entity Mainland (calibrated to AED 375K) Conduit (zero profit) External
3.1 — End-User Unit: monthly cash flow per active loan
flowchart LR UK["UK Holding
(parent)
equity raises"] AMWAL["Amwal
15% Murabaha
5y bullet"] TECH["Tech (DDA Free Zone)
treasury hub
0% tax"] SPV["ADGM SPV
pass-through
zero profit"] PM["Sooner PM
lessor + financier
of record"] BUYER["Buyer
(occupies own property)"] UK -->|"equity injections"| TECH TECH -->|"20% Qard al-Hasan
~AED 20K per origination
(revolving)"| SPV AMWAL -->|"80% advance
~AED 81K per origination"| SPV SPV -->|"buys head-lease
receivable at face value"| PM BUYER -->|"AED 3,750/mo for 60 months
(under Sub-lease)"| PM PM -->|"AED 3,750/mo
forwarded to SPV
(under receivables assignment)"| SPV SPV -->|"15% × outstanding
monthly profit only"| AMWAL classDef qfzp fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef finance fill:#d4e4f4,stroke:#2d4a7a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a1a3a classDef ops fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef ext fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a classDef conduit fill:#e8e8e0,stroke:#6a6a5a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a3a2a class TECH qfzp class AMWAL,UK finance class PM ops class SPV conduit class BUYER ext
Reading the diagram:
  • Origination day. SPV uses 80% advance from Amwal (~AED 81K) + 20% Qard from Tech (~AED 20K) to buy the head-lease receivable from PM at face value (AED 225K = AED 150K principal + AED 75K Murabaha profit element). PM uses the proceeds to pay closing fees (DLD transfer fee, agent commissions, conveyancing) on behalf of the buyer.
  • Lease structure. Buyer head-leases the property to PM at AED 1,000/yr fixed (5-year term). PM sub-leases back to buyer at AED 3,750/mo (matches loan installment). This creates the Sharia ijara form for the Murabaha financing.
  • Monthly. Buyer pays PM AED 3,750/mo. PM forwards the full amount to SPV under the receivables assignment. SPV pays Amwal monthly Murabaha profit (15% × outstanding facility); SPV recycles principal-portion into new originations during the reinvestment period.
  • Recurrence. The cash flow above repeats per origination batch. At Y3 run-rate, ~4,912 active loans simultaneously generate this monthly cash flow.
3.2 — Income recognition: why Sooner only books AED 1,250/mo (not AED 3,750/mo)
flowchart LR BUYER_PAY["Buyer's monthly payment
AED 3,750/mo"] PRINCIPAL["AED 2,500/mo
Principal repayment
Balance sheet only
(return of capital)"] PROFIT["AED 1,250/mo
Murabaha profit element
P&L revenue"] PM_GROSS["Sooner PM
books AED 1,250/mo
as Murabaha profit revenue"] TECH["Tech (DDA Free Zone)
0% tax"] PM_NET["Sooner PM net AED 250/mo
per active loan
then calibrated to ≤ AED 375K total
(Small Business Relief: 0% tax)"] BUYER_PAY --> PRINCIPAL BUYER_PAY --> PROFIT PROFIT --> PM_GROSS PM_GROSS ==>|"AED 400 — credit decisioning services
(Tech credit team in DDA)"| TECH PM_GROSS ==>|"AED 400 — software licence
(lending platform IP)"| TECH PM_GROSS ==>|"AED 200 — customer support operations"| TECH PM_GROSS --> PM_NET TECH -.->|"cost+5% recharge
(quarterly calibration to AED 375K)"| PM_NET classDef qfzp fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef ops fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef ext fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a classDef bs fill:#e8e8e0,stroke:#6a6a5a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a3a2a class TECH qfzp class PM_GROSS,PM_NET ops class BUYER_PAY ext class PRINCIPAL bs
Why income ≠ cash collected:
  • Of the AED 3,750/mo from buyer, only the AED 1,250 profit element is revenue. The AED 2,500 principal portion is balance-sheet — return of the AED 150K closing fees Sooner advanced. Recognising principal as income would double-count (we already deployed the AED 150K as a cost; it has to come back as principal, not profit).
  • The AED 1,250/mo is the 10% annual Murabaha profit on the AED 150K principal. Recognised over the 60-month tenor per AAOIFI FAS 28 (Sharia accounting standard for Murabaha) and IFRS 15 / IFRS 9 (financial-instruments standards).
  • PM books the AED 1,250/mo gross. PM is the legal head-lessee and the Murabaha financier of record (PM holds the head-lease per Amwal's facility documents).
  • PM expenses AED 1,000/mo to Tech via three intra-group services fees. Each fee is priced separately and supported by an EY transfer-pricing study with market comparables: AED 400 credit decisioning services, AED 400 software licence (the lending platform is a copyrighted-software IP asset Tech owns), AED 200 customer support operations. Tech books the AED 1,000/mo as Qualifying Income (UAE Free Zone 0% rate).
  • PM nets AED 250/mo per active loan as servicing margin. At Y3 (4,912 active loans), PM's residual after AED 250/mo × actives + direct opex is calibrated to ≤ AED 375K of taxable income via additional Tech cost+5% recharge. PM CT: 0% via Small Business Relief.
Key assumption (open for EY validation): The three Tech intra-group services fees (AED 400 + 400 + 200 = AED 1,000/mo per active) are arms'-length per FTA Transfer Pricing rules. Comparables: fintech credit-as-a-service (30–50% of net interest margin), proprietary lending-platform licences (25–40% of NIM), outsourced customer-support ops (cost-plus 5–10%). EY validates per-fee rates and supports with Local File / Master File documentation.
Free Zone (0% tax) Finance entity Mainland (calibrated to AED 375K) Conduit (zero profit) External
3.3 — Tenanted Unit: monthly cash flow per active loan (illustrative AED 12,500/mo market rent)
flowchart LR UK["UK Holding"] AMWAL["Amwal
15% Murabaha"] TECH["Tech (DDA Free Zone)
0% tax"] SPV["ADGM SPV
pass-through
zero profit"] PM["Sooner PM
lessor + financier
of record"] BUYER["Buyer
(property owner,
does not occupy)"] TENANT["3rd-party Tenant"] UK -->|"equity"| TECH TECH -->|"20% Qard"| SPV AMWAL -->|"80% advance"| SPV SPV -->|"buys receivable
at face value"| PM TENANT -->|"AED 12,500/mo
market rent"| PM PM -->|"AED 3,750/mo
forwarded to SPV
(loan installment)"| SPV PM -.->|"AED 8,750/mo residual rent
via PM-Buyer Mgmt Agreement
(see open item below)"| BUYER SPV -->|"15% monthly profit"| AMWAL classDef qfzp fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef finance fill:#d4e4f4,stroke:#2d4a7a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a1a3a classDef ops fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef ext fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a classDef conduit fill:#e8e8e0,stroke:#6a6a5a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a3a2a class TECH qfzp class AMWAL,UK finance class PM ops class SPV conduit class BUYER,TENANT ext
What's different from End-User Unit:
  • 3rd-party tenant pays market rent (illustrative AED 12,500/mo on a AED 2M property). PM is the legal head-lessee with sub-letting rights; signs the sub-lease with the tenant on behalf of the buyer.
  • Cash split. Of the AED 12,500/mo received from tenant: AED 3,750/mo flows to SPV as the loan installment (same as End-User Unit); AED 8,750/mo flows back to buyer as residual rental yield (the buyer is the property owner — they retain the rental yield net of the loan installment).
  • Mechanism for the residual flow (open point). Currently structured as a separate PM-Buyer Property Management Agreement in which PM acts as agent for the buyer in collecting and remitting net rental income. See "Open items" section below — this needs Walkers' validation. Fallback if Walkers rejects: variable head-rent under the head-lease (single instrument, but introduces Ejari registration complications).
  • Vacancy. If sub-lease has a vacancy period, no rental flow runs. The buyer continues to owe the AED 3,750/mo loan installment and pays it from own funds. PM's structure is unaffected.
3.4 — Income recognition: same logic as End-User Unit, plus the rental flow
flowchart LR TENANT_PAY["Tenant's monthly payment
AED 12,500/mo"] LOAN_INST["AED 3,750/mo
= AED 2,500 principal
(balance sheet)
+ AED 1,250 profit element
(P&L revenue at PM)"] RESIDUAL["AED 8,750/mo
residual rental yield
passes through PM
(agent treatment IFRS 15)"] PM_GROSS["Sooner PM
books only AED 1,250/mo
as Murabaha profit"] TECH["Tech (DDA Free Zone)
0% tax"] PM_NET["Sooner PM net AED 250/mo
per active loan
(0% via Small Business Relief)"] BUYER_INCOME["Buyer (individual)
books AED 12,500/mo gross rental
(outside UAE CT under personal
real-estate exemption)"] TENANT_PAY --> LOAN_INST TENANT_PAY --> RESIDUAL LOAN_INST --> PM_GROSS RESIDUAL --> BUYER_INCOME PM_GROSS ==>|"AED 1,000/mo total
(3 split fees)"| TECH PM_GROSS --> PM_NET TECH -.->|"cost+5% recharge
(calibration)"| PM_NET classDef qfzp fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef ops fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef ext fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a classDef bs fill:#e8e8e0,stroke:#6a6a5a,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a3a2a class TECH qfzp class PM_GROSS,PM_NET ops class TENANT_PAY,BUYER_INCOME ext class LOAN_INST,RESIDUAL bs
Why PM's books look the same as End-User Unit:
  • The Murabaha profit recognition is identical. AED 1,250/mo per active loan goes onto PM's P&L; PM expenses AED 1,000/mo to Tech via 3 split fees; PM nets AED 250/mo. The fact that the property is tenanted (vs occupied) doesn't change the financing-side income recognition.
  • The AED 8,750/mo rental residual does NOT land on PM's P&L. Under IFRS 15 substance-over-form, PM is acting as an agent for the buyer (under the PM-Buyer Mgmt Agreement). PM's books reflect only the AED 250/mo management fee already inside the financing-side margin. The gross rental flow passes through PM's escrow without crossing PM's revenue line.
  • The buyer books the AED 12,500/mo gross rental income at the buyer's own level. For UAE individual buyers, this is outside UAE CT under Cabinet Decision 49/2023 (personal real-estate investment exemption). For corporate buyers (minority of customers), standard 9% CT applies at the buyer's entity.
Key assumption (open for Walkers/EY validation): The PM-Buyer Property Management Agreement creates a valid agency relationship under UAE law and IFRS 15 substance-over-form. PM as legal head-lessee has the right to sub-let, but operates that right under an agency mandate from the buyer (the property owner) — analogous to how typical UAE property managers sign leases on behalf of owners. PM's books reflect only the agency fee; gross rental does NOT cross PM's P&L. EY/Walkers validate the IFRS 15 agent treatment + FTA classification (no recharacterisation as deemed dividend or shadow loan from PM to buyer). Fallback if rejected: variable head-rent under the head-lease (formula-based, single instrument, with Ejari registration handled via a side letter).

4 — How Sooner RE & Mortgages reduce taxable income (annual view, Y3)

SRE and Mortgages each accumulate large gross income at scale (~AED 111M and ~AED 62M at Y3). Tech absorbs portions of this via cost-plus 5% recharge for shared services + a software licence fee for use of Sooner's lending platform. Residual is taxed at 9% above AED 375K. Numbers are working estimates pending EY refinement.
4.1 — Sooner RE: revenue absorption waterfall (Y3)
flowchart TB REV["Sooner RE revenue Y3 — ~AED 111M
3,860 deals × AED 28,875 (1% commission + conveyancing)"] OPEX["Less direct opex (AED 16.6M)
external agent comm 10% + marketing + payroll + licence"] RECHARGE["Less Tech cost+5% recharge (AED 11M)
SRE's share of group HQ + shared services"] SOFTWARE["Less Tech software licence (AED 11.1M, 10% of revenue)
lending platform IP"] TAXABLE["Taxable income — ~AED 72M
after AED 375K Small Business Relief"] CT["UAE CT @ 9% — ~AED 6.5M/yr"] REV --> OPEX OPEX --> RECHARGE RECHARGE --> SOFTWARE SOFTWARE --> TAXABLE TAXABLE --> CT classDef start fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef deduct fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef result fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a class REV start class OPEX,RECHARGE,SOFTWARE deduct class TAXABLE,CT result
How SRE's CT is determined: SRE earns AED 28,875 per closing (1% commission + conveyancing). At Y3 run-rate of 3,860 new originations, gross revenue is ~AED 111M. Direct opex (~15% of revenue: external agent commissions on shared deals, marketing, payroll, brokerage licence) brings pre-recharge profit to ~AED 94M. Tech absorbs ~AED 22M via cost-plus 5% recharge (SRE's share of group HQ services) + a 10% software licence fee for use of Sooner's lending platform. Residual ~AED 72M is taxed at 9% above the AED 375K Small Business Relief threshold → ~AED 6.5M annual CT. Lever: pushing software licence to 15% saves ~AED 1.5M/yr but adds TP defensibility risk (EY validates).
4.2 — ReMatch Mortgages: revenue absorption waterfall (Y3)
flowchart TB REV["ReMatch Mortgages revenue Y3 — ~AED 62M
3,860 deals × AED 16,800 (0.8% bank referral fee)"] OPEX["Less direct opex (AED 0.2M)
MORI licence + small overhead (broker payroll in Tech recharge)"] RECHARGE["Less Tech cost+5% recharge (AED 6M)
Mortgages' share of group HQ + shared services"] SOFTWARE["Less Tech software licence (AED 6.2M, 10% of revenue)
lending platform IP"] TAXABLE["Taxable income — ~AED 50M
after AED 375K Small Business Relief"] CT["UAE CT @ 9% — ~AED 4.5M/yr"] REV --> OPEX OPEX --> RECHARGE RECHARGE --> SOFTWARE SOFTWARE --> TAXABLE TAXABLE --> CT classDef start fill:#fff4d4,stroke:#7a6a2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a2d0a classDef deduct fill:#d4f4dd,stroke:#2d7a3e,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#0a3a14 classDef result fill:#f4d4d4,stroke:#7a2d2d,stroke-width:1.5px,color:#3a0a0a class REV start class OPEX,RECHARGE,SOFTWARE deduct class TAXABLE,CT result
How Mortgages' CT is determined: Mortgages earns AED 16,800 per closing (0.8% × property value + VAT, paid by the bank). At Y3 run-rate of 3,860 new originations, gross revenue is ~AED 62M. Direct opex is small (~AED 0.2M — MORI licence; mortgage broker payroll is shared and absorbed via Tech recharge). Tech absorbs ~AED 12.2M via cost-plus 5% recharge + 10% software licence. Residual ~AED 50M is taxed at 9% above the AED 375K relief threshold → ~AED 4.5M annual CT.
4.3 — Sooner PM: revenue + late payment fee absorption (Y3)
PM's main income recognition is in §3.2 / §3.4. Recap: PM books AED 1,250/mo per active loan (Murabaha profit element) → expenses AED 1,000/mo to Tech via 3 split fees → nets AED 250/mo per active.
Plus: late payment fees. Sooner PM is the only group entity that can charge late payment fees (regulated by the property management licence). Estimated rate: AED 1,000 per late payment, charged when a buyer's monthly installment is overdue. At an industry-standard ~5% late-payment rate on monthly installments × 4,912 actives × 12 months at Y3 = ~3,000 late events/yr → ~AED 3M/yr of additional PM revenue at Y3. Small relative to the AED 73.7M Murabaha line but a meaningful buffer. PM's gross revenue including late fees ~AED 76.7M Y3; absorbed via the same Tech recharge calibration (additional ~AED 3M of cost+5% to keep PM at ~AED 375K).
4.4 — Tech: aggregator that absorbs at 0% Free Zone rate
Tech's Y3 revenue: ~AED 109M (= AED 58.9M from PM 3 split fees + ~AED 24M from group cost+5% recharge + ~AED 17.3M from SRE/Mortgages software licence). Less ~AED 23M direct opex. Tech residual ~AED 63M sheltered at 0% under UAE Free Zone Qualifying Income (Cabinet Decision 100/2023 Articles 2(9), 2(10), 2(14), and Article 7 Qualifying IP for the software licence portion).

5 — Group P&L by entity (Y3 illustrative — 4,912 active loans)

Numbers in AED, working estimates pending EY refinement. Y3 is the steady-state run-rate after 3 years of facility deployment.
Line item Sooner RE Mortgages Sooner PM ADGM SPV Tech (DDA FZ)
External revenue ~111M ~62M 76.7M (73.7M Murabaha profit + ~3M late fees) 0 0
Intra-group recharge income ~109M (3 PM split fees + cost+5% + software licence)
Direct opex (16.6M) (0.2M) (9.5M) (small) (23M)
Tech 3 split fees from PM (58.9M) +58.9M
Tech software licence (10% of revenue) (11.1M) (6.2M) +17.3M
Tech cost+5% recharge (11M) (6M) (4.9M) +~24M (allocated by revenue)
Taxable income ~72M ~50M ~375K 0 ~63M
Effective CT rate 9% above 375K 9% above 375K 0% (relief) 0% (no income) 0% (Free Zone)
CT (AED) ~6.5M ~4.5M 0 0 0
Tech revenue (~AED 109M intra-group) = AED 58.9M PM split-fees (3 fees × 4,912 actives × 12) + AED 24M cost+5% recharge to mainland subs + AED 17.3M software licence to SRE/Mortgages (10% of mainland revenue). The AED 63M residual at Tech is sheltered at 0% under UAE Free Zone Qualifying Income rules. Amwal monthly profit (15% × outstanding) is an SPV cost offset by the receivables-purchase mechanics — net at SPV is zero. Group Y3 CT: ~AED 11M (SRE ~AED 6.5M + Mortgages ~AED 4.5M); group net income ~AED 75M; effective rate ~14–15%. The software licence rate is the lever — see "Open items" below.
Year-by-year CT trajectory (per the financial model):
  • Y1: Group is loss-making (~AED 1.91M loss). Zero CT. Loss carried forward against Y2 income.
  • Y2: First profitable year (~AED 7M group net). CT ~AED 2–3M (effective ~30–40% because the AED 375K relief is a smaller % of growing income). Y1 loss offsets ~AED 1.4M.
  • Y3: Run-rate (~AED 75M group net). CT ~AED 11M (effective ~14–15%).
  • Why effective > statutory 9%: SRE + Mortgages each hit the 9% bracket on residual profit beyond what cost-plus + software licence absorb. The AED 375K relief is small relative to AED 70M+ taxable income at Y3. UAE only — no UK exposure.

6 — Open items & key validation points

Items requiring resolution before signing operative documents. Each is flagged with the responsible party.

Walkers + EY PM-Buyer Property Management Agreement justification (Tenanted Unit)

The Tenanted Unit residual rental flow (AED 8,750/mo to buyer) is currently structured via a PM-Buyer Property Management Agreement under which PM acts as agent for the buyer in collecting net rental income. The structural concern: PM is the legal head-lessee with sub-letting rights, and the head-lease is at AED 1,000/yr fixed against a sub-lease at ~AED 150,000/yr — this can look like a 99% discount on rental rights that PM grants back via the Mgmt Agreement.

Validation needed:

  • Walkers confirms the dual structure (head-lease + Mgmt Agreement) is enforceable under UAE law and consistent with how typical UAE PM agency arrangements operate.
  • EY confirms the IFRS 15 agent treatment for PM (only management fee on PM's P&L; gross rental flow does not cross PM's revenue line).
  • EY confirms the FTA does not recharacterise the residual remittance as deemed dividend or shadow loan from PM to buyer.

Fallback if rejected: variable head-rent under the head-lease itself (formula-based: variable rent = max(0, sub-lease income − loan installment)). Single instrument; same economic outcome; introduces Ejari-registration complications that Walkers handles via a side letter.

EY Tech UAE Free Zone Qualifying Income status

The structure relies on Tech qualifying for the UAE Free Zone 0% rate on its intra-group services revenue. Validation needed:

  • Tech has adequate substance in DDA: employees physically located in DDA, IP creation in DDA, treasury operations in DDA. ✓ Working assumption.
  • Tech's revenue mix — three PM split fees (credit decisioning, software licence, customer support ops), cost+5% recharge to mainland subs, treasury services to SPV — all fall under Qualifying Activities (UAE Cabinet Decision 100/2023, Articles 2 and 7).
  • The "de minimis" test for non-qualifying revenue (lower of 5% / AED 5M) is satisfied. Tech's only revenue streams are the three PM intra-group services fees + cost+5% recharge to mainland subs + software licence fees to SRE/Mortgages — all Qualifying Activities. No external brand royalty income.
  • The credit decisioning services fee specifically requires Tech to maintain its credit team in DDA with documented decision authority. ✓ Already operating.

EY Transfer pricing on the three PM split fees

The AED 1,000/mo per-active total is split across three priced-separately fees. Each requires arms'-length validation with comparables:

  • Credit decisioning services — AED 400/mo per active. Comparable: fintech credit-as-a-service market rates, typically 30–50% of net interest margin. Tech's credit team in DDA performs underwriting + eligibility + portfolio monitoring.
  • Software licence — AED 400/mo per active. Comparable: proprietary lending-platform licence rates, typically 25–40% of NIM. Tech owns the lending platform as copyrighted-software IP (Qualifying Intellectual Property under the modified nexus approach).
  • Customer support operations — AED 200/mo per active. Comparable: outsourced ops cost-plus 5–10% margin.

EY's TP team builds the Local File / Master File documentation supporting these rates.

EY ADGM SPV: structural compliance under zero-profit pass-through

SPV is structured to book zero profit (buys receivables from PM at face value; cash in = cash out). This neutralises the SPV's ADGM Free Zone tax classification as a leakage variable. Validation needed:

  • The pass-through mechanism is FTA-defensible — no anti-avoidance recharacterisation of SPV's role.
  • SPV satisfies minimum compliance even with zero income (audited statements, registered office in ADGM).
  • Acceptable that SPV is a corporate-services-managed entity with no employees, given zero income.

EY Software licence rate from Tech to Sooner RE + Mortgages

SRE and Mortgages use Tech's lending platform (originations engine, customer matching, CRM, listing aggregator integration). Tech licenses this platform to both subs at a percentage of revenue; the rate is a TP variable that sets the cushion against the AED 375K Small Business Relief cap.

  • Working assumption: 10% of mainland sub revenue (i.e., ~AED 11M/yr at Y3 from SRE + ~AED 6.2M/yr from Mortgages = ~AED 17M/yr absorbed at Tech).
  • Combined with cost+5% recharge (~AED 17M/yr to SRE + Mortgages), this absorbs ~AED 34M of mainland profit at Y3, leaving ~AED 119M residual taxed at 9% (~AED 10.7M CT/yr at Y3).
  • Pushing software licence to 15% saves ~AED 1–2M/yr of CT but adds TP defensibility risk. EY validates the rate via comparables: proprietary lending-platform licences typically 8–25% of NIM; we sit conservatively at 10%.

This open item is the lever for tuning the Y3 effective CT rate between ~13% (aggressive software licence) and ~16% (cost-plus only).

EY UAE Substantial Shareholding Exemption / dividend mechanics (UK Holding ↔ UAE subs)

UK Holding is the offshore parent. No brand royalty is charged (per group decision: no UK royalty exposure to keep tax simple and UAE-only). Validation needed:

  • UK SSE applies to dividends from each UAE sub if ever declared (≥ 10% holding test, 12-month period, trading-company test). Confirm with UK adviser if/when group plans to upstream profits.
  • UK CFC implications now that an active trading group sits below UK Holding. Confirm.

Practically: Amwal's facility blocks parent dividends out of UK Holding for the term, so this is largely deferred. Engage UK adviser closer to facility maturity / refinance.

Sharif + Sharia adviser Sharia structure approval

The lease loop (head-lease + Murabaha-form sub-lease in End-User Unit; head-lease + market sub-lease + Mgmt Agreement in Tenanted Unit) and the receivables-purchase mechanics need Amwal's Sharia Supervisory Board sign-off. Validation needed:

  • Head-lease at AED 1,000/yr is acceptable as a Sharia ijara overlay on the Murabaha financing.
  • SPV's "buy at face value, collect at face value" structure satisfies AAOIFI FAS 28 for Murabaha.
  • PM as Wakala/agent for buyer in Tenanted Unit residual-rent flow is Sharia-compliant.

Gabriel PM ownership: 51% Sooner / 49% Shaybani (agreed) — covenants required if 49% / 51% reverses

Per the MMA review with Victoria, the agreed structure is Sooner 51% / Al-Shaybani family office 49%, with Shaybani holding zero reserve matters and zero dividend rights. Shaybani compensation is exclusively the 0.3% per-origination service fee paid at origination from equity.

Contingency if ownership reverses (Sooner 49% / Shaybani 51%): a Shareholders' Agreement is required with Sooner-side reserve matters covering: any dividend declaration; any change to Tech split-fee rates (AED 400 / 400 / 200) or the cost+5% recharge formula; any change to the PM permitted-payment list; any change to the Shaybani service contract; any sale or transfer of PM equity. Without these covenants, the Sooner-minority position cannot defend the cash-flow architecture against majority-shareholder challenge. The Shaybani buy-out option (existing AED 250K provision) provides a clean exit path when Sooner can self-guarantee the AED 5M PM-licence bank guarantee.

Tax delta between the two ownership splits: < AED 50K/yr at Y3 run-rate. UK SSE applies in both because the test is ≥ 10% holding (49% qualifies).

Sharif + Walkers Backup servicer for $10M tranche

Current proposal: ClearGrid acts as backup servicer via a power of attorney + standing servicing agreement, operating under Sooner PM's licence umbrella. ClearGrid commits in writing to obtaining its own UAE Property Management licence within 18 months, providing a clean migration path to direct backup servicing.

Gabriel "Sooner Corporate Structure" PDF correction

The currently-circulating PDF labels Holding → PM at 49%. Per the agreed structure, this should be 51% (Sooner control). Correct before sending to Philippe to avoid an externally-visible inconsistency with the MMA framing.